The far from simple task of fulfilling subject access requests!

When individuals call into your fulfilment centre, or reach you via email or letter, with a request exercising their rights under GDPR, they will be triggering what is in reality a complex process.

They may alternatively be directly accessing your on-line privacy portal, using self-service, but the steps that they will follow will be broadly the same.

Step one is to have all your data relating to each individual that your organisation deals with joined together into a single customer view. This will need to include on-line data you are holding like pages browsed linked to cookie IDs, as well as off-line data such as transactions. To make matters more difficult, the personal data may be held in an unstructured form such as emails or reports. It will be far beyond the capabilities of most organisation to have the unstructured data pre-packaged as part of the single customer view, but you will at least need the capability of searching for it.

Step two is to identify that the individual approaching you is who they purport to be. If they reach you by email or letter, you will most probably have a requirement to verify them by checking on some other identifiers you may hold, to avoid handing over personal information to the wrong recipient or making false changes to the information you hold on someone.

Step three is to be able to access what some people are now calling a consent vault; the place where all the opt-ins and opt-outs are held. GDPR has defined the information you need to hold about each consent that has been provided, such as how it was obtained and what statement the individual is agreeing or not agreeing to. The consent vault will,we expect,naturally form part of the single customer view. However, as well as holding the individual consents you will need to interpret them so that you can inform Mrs Smith of what, as things stand, you may or may not use her data for. We suggest developing a set of ‘traffic lights’ that work off the consents already provided, and which give clear guidance about what types of activity may be undertaken by which channel.

Step four is to allow Mrs Smith to change her consents. This is gong to be much easier if you have the traffic light system as Mrs Smith will have a clear idea of what is in place for her now, and hence what she might want to change. The new consents or withdrawal of consents will need to be data captured and potentially a record of that change sent to Mrs smith.

Step five comes when Mrs Smith asks for a copy of all the information you hold about her. A relatively easy step if you have the single customer view in place, but a much more difficult one if you don’t. And then if you have unstructured data referring to Mrs Smith this will also need to be searched. There are technology tools around to help your search process if the amount of unstructured data is very considerable or spread over several different systems.

Step six comes when Mrs Smith sees her data and wants to correct it. The corrections will need to be data captured and the changes will need to be communicated to any systems that are upstream of where the single customer view is being held. Good practice will, we expect, be to send Mrs Smith some form of notification of the new details you are holding.

Step seven happens when Mrs Smith exercises her rights to data portability. You will then have to provide her data in machine readable format to another data controller that she specifies. We envisage creating an HTML or equivalent file, and sending it to Mrs Smith by email. The data transferred should include not just data provided by Mrs Smith but data generated by you.

Step eight happens when Mrs Smith exercises her right to be forgotten. In this case you can maintain any non-personal data like transactions relating to her, but you have to delete or overwrite any personal data like email, mobile phone number, postal address, cookie ID etc. As well as deleting them in the single customer view, you will need to inform the upstream systems of the request so that they can do the same thing.

Step nine involves taking account of Mrs Smith’s requests when it comes to further processing of her data. She may have opted out of profiling, which means that you will not be able to manipulate her data using algorithms to make decisions concerning what you do or do not want to say to her, or what offers you want to make to her. She may alternatively not have provided positive consent to be emailed, so you must not include her in email campaigns etc. etc.

Step ten is to maintain an audit trail of what has been done in respect of GDPR requests. We suggest that these actions are most conveniently recorded as part of the information held in the single customer view. In this way you can meet any challenges from an individual or the ICO concerning how you are managing the GDPR processes.

We have tried to summarise in these ten steps all the process intricacies involved in dealing with GDPR requests. We have developed our own cloud-based technology, called UniFida, to support clients in fulfilling such individual requests. See www.unifida.co.uk.